SEXUL ORAL CU MUSCATURI DE PENIS, SPETA CHEIE PENTRU ADMITEREA IN MAGISTRATURA - Comisia de elaborare a subiectelor din INM a cerut viitorilor magistrati sa rezolve o mare dilema judiciara: O fi santaj care absoarbe vatamarea corporala, o fi legitima aparare muscatura in cazul neachitarii tarifului pentru un sex oral? Aflati raspunsul
Subiect halucinant, ridicol si de toata jena la examenul de admitere in magistratura din 2013! Cei 1.000 de juristi care au sustinut duminica, 27 ianuarie 2013, proba scrisa de verificare a cunostintelor de drept din cadrul Concursului de admitere in magistratura, organizat in perioada noiembrie 2012 – martie 2013 au trebuit sa analizeze desfasurarea unui act sexual pentru a constata daca in timpul acestuia s-a produs o infractiune. Concret, la Grila nr. 1 – disciplina Drept penal, juristii s-au confruntat cu o intrebare atipica, intr-o speta a fost dat cazul unui barbat care a promis unei femei suma de 150 de lei in schimbul unui sex oral. Nemultumit de prestatia femeii, barbatul a informat-o pe aceasta ca nu ii va mai da banii promisi, explicandu-i ca este nemultumit de calitatea actului oferit. Reactia femeii a fost una extrema! L-a muscat de penis, amenintandu-l ca nu ii va da drumul pana nu ii da banii promisi. Barbatul s-a ales cu 23 de zile de ingrijiri medicale dupa ce femeia l-a eliberat, dupa ce si-a primit banii.
Cu astfel de intrebari se intra in magistratura. Iata si intrebarea din Grila nr. 1 – disciplina Drept penal, pozitia 71:
"71.In timp ce X intretinea un act sexual cu Y, majora, pe care o cunoscuse intr-un club si careia ii promisese suma de 150 lei in schimbul acestui act, i-a spus lui Y ca nu-i va remite suma intrucat nu este multumit de prestatia ei. In acest moment, Y si-a infipt dintii in organul sexual al lui X, acceptand sa il elibereze doar cand X i-a remis cei 150 lei. X a suferit leziuni ce au necesitat 23 de zile de ingrijiri medicale pentru vindecare. In acest caz:
A.fapta de vatamare corporala comisa de Y este savarsita in legitima aparare, Y actionand pentru recuperarea sumei datorata de X;
B.Y nu a comis o infractiune de santaj care absoarbe vatamarea corporala;
C.Y nu a comis o infractiune de perversiune sexuala."
Nota: Precizam ca raspunsul corect la acest punct, conform grilei INM, este punctul C
Directorul INM, judecatoarea Octavia Spineanu ne-a invocat ca nu ne poate transmite numele membrilor Comisiei care a redactat intrebarile, din ratiuni de "protectie"
Lumeajustitiei.ro a contactat-o pe judecatoarea Octavia Spineanu (foto) pentru a afla numele membrilor care fac parte din Comisia de elaborare a subiectelor de la concursul de admitere in magistratura 2013. Am fost curiosi sa aflam cui i-a putut trece prin cap sa prezinte o asemena speta, cum au convenit membri comisiei sa aprobe o asemenea speta, care in opinia noastra, ridica mari semne de intrebare asupra seriozitatii examenului si ne face sa ne intrebam daca nu cumva vreun membru al comisiei a trecut printr-o atare experienta.
Judecatoarea Octavia Spineanu ne-a dat urmatorul raspuns: "Nu putem face publice numele membrilor Comisiei de elaborare a subiectelor pentru examenul de admitere in magistratura decat dupa finalizarea concursului. Decizia a fost luata inainte de inceperea examenului si reprezinta o masura de protectie a acestora".
Suntem curiosi daca la viitorul concurs pentru intrarea in magistratura sau la definitivat, cine stie, Comisia de elaborare a subiectelor nu se va axa si pe o speta privitoare la sexul anal consimtit, dar care a provocat leziuni fara premeditare...
*Cititi aici Grila nr. 1 din cadrul Concursului de admitere in magistratura - Pozitia 71
Adauga comentariu
DISCLAIMER
Atentie! Postati pe propria raspundere!
Inainte de a posta, cititi aici regulamentul: Termeni legali si Conditii
Comentarii
# veta 31 January 2013 13:20 +24
# penisache 31 January 2013 16:33 +25
# penisache 31 January 2013 16:50 +9
# itdr 31 January 2013 23:10 +7
# DOREL 1 February 2013 09:13 +19
# radu 5 February 2013 11:27 -5
# GIGEL 1 February 2013 13:42 +6
# GIGEL - informare 1 February 2013 13:45 +5
# GIGEL - reloded 1 February 2013 13:49 +4
# George 1 February 2013 15:43 -4
# emil 3 February 2013 10:01 +1
# George 1 February 2013 15:59 -4
# GIGEL - ILUMINATU' 1 February 2013 18:40 0
# emil 3 February 2013 10:05 +2
# brutus 1 February 2013 21:29 +4
# alina priapica 2 February 2013 01:00 +2
# LOL 2 February 2013 18:40 -4
# Grila mi se pare incompleta 31 January 2013 13:30 +77
# John 1 February 2013 10:59 +4
# veta 31 January 2013 13:33 +22
# Imi place subiectul , pozitia 69 in special !! Cu magistrati 31 January 2013 13:35 +34
# Cora 31 January 2013 13:37 +22
# Goe 31 January 2013 14:00 +32
# john 1 February 2013 11:02 +7
# Cata 1 February 2013 11:32 +5
# Marian Bolovan 1 February 2013 19:59 +2
# oblea 31 January 2013 14:06 +25
# Mirela Predan 31 January 2013 14:13 +13
# Gânditorul de la Hamangia 31 January 2013 14:31 +19
# Baumax model rotopercutant 31 January 2013 14:57 +17
# Gabriela 31 January 2013 15:27 -12
# Gabriela 31 January 2013 15:29 -11
# Stan Alexandra 1 February 2013 14:38 +2
# Cornel 31 January 2013 15:36 +7
# dela Minulescu 1 February 2013 00:17 +8
# Valentin 31 January 2013 15:49 +15
# mircea 31 January 2013 15:51 +12
# adi 31 January 2013 16:07 +12
# coect 31 January 2013 17:50 +6
Citeza pe mircea
# Talharitza poetesa 4 February 2013 20:26 0
Citeza pe coect"][quote name="mircea
# Vlad 31 January 2013 23:10 +5
# doggy stile 1 February 2013 17:27 +2
# Dan 31 January 2013 16:22 +29
# Laszlo 31 January 2013 23:51 +10
# Sorin 1 February 2013 00:28 +6
# EMIL 3 February 2013 10:21 +1
# AVOCAT-INDIGNAT 31 January 2013 16:37 +15
# c.s. 31 January 2013 16:51 -1
# veta 31 January 2013 17:20 +15
# olimpia 1 February 2013 22:01 +2
# c.s. 31 January 2013 16:59 -9
# c.s. 31 January 2013 17:00 +1
# Adina 31 January 2013 17:44 -4
# JUDEX 31 January 2013 18:57 +9
# avocat 31 January 2013 22:44 +6
# nicu 1 February 2013 13:40 +1
# Lori 31 January 2013 17:45 0
# adi 31 January 2013 17:49 0
# pt adi 31 January 2013 18:20 0
# Adina 31 January 2013 17:46 0
# Fost judecator long time ago 31 January 2013 18:09 +13
# ARGUS 31 January 2013 18:42 -3
# veta 31 January 2013 20:03 +5
# jan 31 January 2013 19:22 +2
# Protestatara 31 January 2013 19:33 +4
# Băiatu' lu' Luluţa 31 January 2013 19:37 +9
# Sursele!!! 31 January 2013 19:44 +4
# taras cristi 31 January 2013 20:57 +5
# veta 31 January 2013 21:01 +1
# hihi 31 January 2013 22:04 0
# JUDEX 31 January 2013 22:24 +3
# veta-JUDEX 31 January 2013 23:15 +2
# JUDEX 31 January 2013 23:42 +2
# Rambo 1 February 2013 01:24 +1
# Avocat traditional 1 February 2013 07:21 -2
# Rambo 1 February 2013 10:51 +3
# Avocat traditional 1 February 2013 21:37 -2
# Rambo 1 February 2013 22:29 0
# avocat traditional 1 February 2013 22:57 -2
# Rambo 2 February 2013 01:08 0
# avocat BB 2 February 2013 13:10 +3
# Avocat traditional 2 2 February 2013 15:29 -1
# Rambo 2 February 2013 17:00 0
# avocat BB 2 February 2013 13:19 +2
# un jurist oarecare (oricum,nu avocat) 2 February 2013 15:19 -2
# un alt jurist 2 February 2013 15:30 +2
# un jurist oarecare 2 February 2013 15:51 -3
# Rudolf 2 February 2013 16:50 +3
# un jurist oarecare 2 February 2013 18:01 -3
# tipatescu 2 February 2013 18:44 +4
# avocat BB 2 February 2013 17:57 +4
# un jurist oarecare=avocat traditional 2 February 2013 20:29 +4
# Un jurist oarecare 2 February 2013 22:06 -4
# Bebe 2 February 2013 23:44 +4
# Avocat traditional 3 February 2013 00:22 -4
# Bebe 3 February 2013 02:40 +3
# veta -judex 1 February 2013 20:25 0
# INTERLOPUL SORIC 3,50...NOTA DE INSPECTOR SEF 31 January 2013 22:58 +9
# C G 31 January 2013 23:10 0
# VIKY 31 January 2013 23:21 +5
# CG 31 January 2013 23:27 -5
# VIKY 31 January 2013 23:44 +1
# catalin G 31 January 2013 23:56 -1
# HCC 1 February 2013 07:08 +1
# Radu 1 February 2013 07:28 +1
# Sica 1 February 2013 08:57 +2
# Bogdana 1 February 2013 09:39 0
# organu' erectil 2 February 2013 12:38 +3
# THE GODFATHER 1 February 2013 10:02 +1
# Pestele de la Barou 1 February 2013 10:50 +2
# sin 1 February 2013 12:12 +2
# BLACK 1 February 2013 13:28 +1
# Marinaru 1 February 2013 14:19 +1
# ASOCIAŢIA VICTIMELOR MAGISTRATILOR DIN ROMÂNIA 1 February 2013 16:56 +3
# manifest 1 February 2013 21:13 +1
# godja florin 1 February 2013 19:53 0
# olimpia 1 February 2013 20:24 0
# veta 1 February 2013 20:31 0
# olimpia 1 February 2013 20:59 0
# olimpia 1 February 2013 20:28 -1
# Goe 1 February 2013 22:37 0
# olimpia 1 February 2013 20:29 -1
# veta 1 February 2013 20:37 0
# olimpia 1 February 2013 21:01 +1
# veta 1 February 2013 20:54 +1
# olimpia 1 February 2013 21:06 -2
# veta 1 February 2013 21:14 +1
# olimpia 1 February 2013 21:23 -1
# olimpia 1 February 2013 21:25 -1
# veta 1 February 2013 21:31 0
# Pufi 1 February 2013 21:40 -2
# veta 1 February 2013 21:48 +1
# ARGUS 1 February 2013 21:51 0
# olimpia 1 February 2013 21:54 0
# veta 1 February 2013 22:06 0
# ARGUS 1 February 2013 22:18 0
# ARFGUS 1 February 2013 22:14 0
# olimpia 1 February 2013 23:44 0
# ARGUS 1 February 2013 23:51 0
# OMna 2 February 2013 05:53 +2
# Litan 2 February 2013 14:55 +3
# emil 3 February 2013 10:51 0
# avocat BB 3 February 2013 14:58 +3
# ARGUS 3 February 2013 12:33 0
# avocat traditional 3 February 2013 13:18 -2
# avocat BB 3 February 2013 14:40 0
# avocat BB 3 February 2013 14:47 +3
# Avocat traditional 2 3 February 2013 15:32 -2
# avocat BB 3 February 2013 17:11 +3
# BOTILIU POMPA 3 February 2013 14:53 -2
# basescu perverssss 5 February 2013 18:29 +1
# Stefan 30 May 2013 14:32 0
# avocat din oficiu 21 October 2015 06:18 0
# Gogu din Parâng 24 November 2016 10:50 0
# gigi 24 November 2016 13:10 0
# gogu 24 November 2016 13:15 0
# ARIZONA 25 November 2016 10:30 0
# branza, barza, varza, manz 25 November 2016 12:44 0
# Cuuuu-culita 25 November 2016 10:44 0
# titanul2008 10 December 2016 08:56 0